Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Martin Damm vs Mateo Gomez Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Damm vs Gomez analysis and find out who is favored!
Martin Damm vs Mateo Gomez Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Damm 1 - 0 Gomez
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Damm has won 48.43% of points on their second serve, while Gomez has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Damm, in recent form, has won 45.41% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gomez has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.31% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Damm has saved 70.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gomez has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Damm has won 64.47% of matches played (W/L 49/ 27), with Gomez winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Damm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 63/ 40), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 42/ 41). Gomez has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 13/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 22/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Damm has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 28/ 20), where as Gomez has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Damm winning 1 times and Gomez being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Damm winning 2 and Gomez winning 0. The last match between Damm and Gomez was at the M25 Santo Domingo, 16-06-2022, Second, Hard with Martin Damm getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:12:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Damm and Gomez have played a deciding set 0 times, with Damm winning 0 times and Gomez 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Damm winning 0, and Gomez 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Damm has played against opponents with an average rank of 264.03 while Gomez has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Damm has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gomez has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Damm has converted 33.82% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gomez has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
179
Rank
175
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
57% (135-103)
Career Total W/L
54% (35-30)
52% (14-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$107,985
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Martin Damm | Mateo Gomez |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:12:0 | 1:12:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (31/50) | 58% (26/45) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (23/31) | 65% (17/26) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 68% (13/19) | 32% (6/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (22/45) | 28% (14/50) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-0 |
Stats 
Martin Damm
Player
Mateo Gomez
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Martin Damm | Mateo Gomez |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (14/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (31/33) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (333/340) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 17% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 1.11 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 365 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 121 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:46 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 325.7 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1283/2175) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 77% (992/1283) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (432/892) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (46/136) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 33% (688/2078) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (11/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (13/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 48% (10/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (7/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (15/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Martin Damm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Martin Damm
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
9
Aces
19
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
25 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Martin Damm
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
5
Aces
9
9
Double Faults
8
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
51%
(
55 of
107)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
17
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
3
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
52%
(
27 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Martin Damm
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
9
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
7
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Martin Damm
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
13
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Tommy Paul
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
43
Total Points Won
43
|
4-6 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Zhizhen Zhang
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
87)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Martin Damm
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
13
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
23 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Mateo Gomez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Mateo Gomez
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mateo Gomez
Player
Alejandro Mendoza
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
1
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
6
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Mateo Gomez
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mateo Gomez
Player
Tobias Franco
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cayetano March
Player
Mateo Gomez
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mateo Gomez
Player
Luis Britto
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mateo Gomez
Player
Kareem Allaf
79%
(
59 of
75)
1st Serve %
46%
(
29 of
63)
1
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
71
|
0-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Mateo Gomez
41%
(
29 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Mateo Gomez
68%
(
78 of
115)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
46 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jose Pereira
Player
Mateo Gomez
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
73 of
110)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
73)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
8 of
37)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
22 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
110
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(6) 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Damm Vs Gomez Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
